1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 1973 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1973 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Matra-Simca M25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 NSU Ro 80. 1973 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 1989 Matra-Simca M25 has manual transmission. 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 1973 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | NSU |
| Model | M25 | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1764 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 363 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
