1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 1981 Audi 4000
To start off, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1981 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi 4000. 1981 Audi 4000 has automatic transmission and 1989 Matra-Simca M25 has manual transmission. 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Audi 4000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 1981 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Audi |
| Model | M25 | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1764 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 363 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
