1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 1982 Mini MK IV
To start off, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 1,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Matra-Simca M25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 1982 Mini MK IV | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Mini |
Model | M25 | MK IV |
Year Released | 1989 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1764 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
Torque | 363 Nm | 61 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |