1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 1985 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Matra-Simca M25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 1985 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Nissan |
Model | M25 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1989 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1764 cc | 1268 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 363 Nm | 96 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |