1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Omega. (300 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 2002 Opel Omega | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Opel |
Model | M25 | Omega |
Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1764 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 363 Nm | 300 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |