1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis (373 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. (363 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis has automatic transmission and 1989 Matra-Simca M25 has manual transmission. 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Mercury |
Model | M25 | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1764 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
Torque | 363 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |