1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. (363 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Matra-Simca M25.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Nissan |
| Model | M25 | R 390 GT1 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 543 HP |
| Torque | 363 Nm | 637 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
