1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 2006 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2006 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Matra-Simca M25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Sequoia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Sequoia (426 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. (363 Nm). This means 2006 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Matra-Simca M25.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 2006 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Toyota |
| Model | M25 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1764 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Torque | 363 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
