1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 1,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Mazda |
Model | M25 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1764 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
Torque | 363 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |