1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 2012 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2012 Nissan Armada is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Armada (521 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. (363 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. 2012 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 1989 Matra-Simca M25 has manual transmission. 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 2012 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Nissan |
| Model | M25 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1764 cc | 5600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
| Torque | 363 Nm | 521 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
