1989 Matra-Simca M25 vs. 2013 Honda Fit
To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 1,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Matra-Simca M25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda Fit. (144 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | 2013 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Honda |
| Model | M25 | Fit |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1764 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 115 HP |
| Torque | 363 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
