1989 Mazda 323 vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1989 Mazda 323 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mazda 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda 323 (110 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Because 1968 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Mazda 323 (126 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1989 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Mazda 323 | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Mazda | ZAZ |
| Model | 323 | 966 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 72 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2170 mm |
