1989 Mazda 323 vs. 2000 Toyota Solara
To start off, 2000 Toyota Solara is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Solara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Solara (187 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (110 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Solara should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Solara (283 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (126 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Solara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Mazda 323 | 2000 Toyota Solara | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 323 | Solara |
Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 283 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.4 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |