1989 Mazda 323 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (110 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323.
Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Tundra (299 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (126 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2002 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Mazda 323 | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | 323 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 299 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3270 mm |
