1989 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (171 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-350 weights approximately 511 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Mazda 323 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 323 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 171 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1496 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 62 L |