1989 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (130 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (137 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Mazda 323 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 323 | C30 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4265 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2639 mm |
