1989 Mazda 323 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP) has 482 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 930 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 642 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Mazda 323 | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 323 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 556 HP |
Torque | 104 Nm | 746 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 68 L |