1989 Mazda 323 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (164 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Mazda 323 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 323 | C30 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1046 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |