1989 Mazda 323 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Mazda 323 (164 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 1989 Mazda 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1989 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1989 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Mazda 323 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Mazda | Smart |
| Model | 323 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 1867 mm |
