1989 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Ecosport (118 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 626. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Ecosport (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 626. (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Ecosport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Mazda 626 | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 626 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
