1989 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1989 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda RX-7 (200 HP) has 91 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1989 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Mazda RX-7 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | RX-7 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2614 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 109 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2490 mm |
