1989 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1989 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda RX-7 (200 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Because 1989 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Mazda RX-7 (264 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1989 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Mazda RX-7 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-7 | Clio |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2614 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 264 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2480 mm |