1989 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1989 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda RX-7 (200 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2010 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Mazda RX-7 (264 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1989 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio. 2010 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 1989 Mazda RX-7 has manual transmission. 1989 Mazda RX-7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Mazda RX-7 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-7 | Clio |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2614 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 264 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 238 km/hour | 186 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2580 mm |