1989 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1989 Mitsubishi Pajero. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1989 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 287 kg more than 2006 Acura CSX.
Because 1989 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Acura |
Model | Pajero | CSX |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2477 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |