1989 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1989 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 770 kg more than 1989 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Space Wagon | Starfire |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1755 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1820 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3130 mm |
