1989 Nissan Santana vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Nissan Santana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Nissan Santana would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 264 more horse power than 1989 Nissan Santana. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1989 Nissan Santana.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Nissan Santana, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Nissan Santana. (142 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Nissan Santana.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Nissan Santana | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Santana | UTE |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
