1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 580 kg more than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Because 1965 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | ZAZ |
Model | Cutlass | 966 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2170 mm |