1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1976 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Ford Falcon weights approximately 155 kg more than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1976 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1976 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
Model | Cutlass | Falcon |
Year Released | 1989 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2830 mm |