1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1986 Nissan Leopard
To start off, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 215 kg more than 1986 Nissan Leopard.
Because 1986 Nissan Leopard is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Nissan Leopard. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1986 Nissan Leopard | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Nissan |
Model | Cutlass | Leopard |
Year Released | 1989 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 98 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |