1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 230 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Chevrolet |
Model | Cutlass | Captiva |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2707 mm |