1989 Opel Omega vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo

To start off, 2000 Smart ForTwo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Opel Omega would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Opel Omega (89 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Opel Omega weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Opel Omega (151 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (110 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1989 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Smart ForTwo.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Opel Omega 2000 Smart ForTwo
Make Opel Smart
Model Omega ForTwo
Year Released 1989 2000
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 1796 cc 698 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 151 Nm 110 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 2200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1200 kg 820 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 2510 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1540 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 1820 mm