1989 Opel Omega vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Opel Omega would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1989 Opel Omega. (89 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1989 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1989 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Opel Omega. (151 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Opel Omega.

Compare all specifications: