1989 Plymouth Colt vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1989 Plymouth Colt is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ronda (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Colt. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 59 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Plymouth Colt (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (122 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Plymouth Colt | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Plymouth | Seat |
Model | Colt | Ronda |
Year Released | 1989 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2460 mm |