1989 Plymouth Sundance vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1989 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (103 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 1 kg more than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Plymouth Sundance | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Plymouth | Toyota |
Model | Sundance | Celica |
Year Released | 1989 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1176 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2620 mm |