1989 Plymouth Sundance vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2000 Smart ForTwo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 359 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Plymouth Sundance | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Plymouth | Smart |
| Model | Sundance | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 816 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 1820 mm |
