1989 Plymouth Sundance vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford F-150 (298 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford F-150 weights approximately 950 kg more than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Plymouth Sundance | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Plymouth | Ford |
| Model | Sundance | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 298 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5415 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2624 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3200 mm |
