1989 Plymouth Voyager vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 462 kg more than 1989 Plymouth Voyager.
Because 2010 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Plymouth Voyager | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Plymouth | Cadillac |
| Model | Voyager | STS |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 320 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1812 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1844 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2957 mm |
