1989 Renault 25 vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 1989 Renault 25 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1989 Renault 25. (102 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1989 Renault 25.
Because 1980 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 164 (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Renault 25. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Renault 25 | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | 25 | 164 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3350 mm |