1989 Renault 4 vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1989 Renault 4 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 956 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Renault 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Zastava 850 K (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1989 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Zastava 850 K should accelerate faster than 1989 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Zastava 850 K weights approximately 160 kg more than 1989 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Renault 4 | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | 4 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 695 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2010 mm |
