1989 Renault 4 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1989 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Renault 4.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Renault 4. (62 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Renault 4.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Renault 4 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | 4 | 3 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 62 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2639 mm |