1989 Rover 216 vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1989 Rover 216 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Rover 216 (114 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Rover 216 should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 570 kg more than 1989 Rover 216.
Because 1951 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Rover 216, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Rover 216 | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Rover | Talbot |
Model | 216 | Baby |
Year Released | 1989 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3130 mm |