1989 Rover Range Rover vs. 2002 Toyota Pod
To start off, 2002 Toyota Pod is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Pod (194 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1989 Rover Range Rover. (185 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod should accelerate faster than 1989 Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1046 kg more than 2002 Toyota Pod.
Because 1989 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota Pod. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Pod (430 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Rover Range Rover. (319 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Pod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Rover Range Rover | 2002 Toyota Pod | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | Range Rover | Pod |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3947 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1986 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 48 L |
