1989 Rover Range Rover vs. 2008 Tata Nano
To start off, 2008 Tata Nano is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Rover Range Rover (185 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1386 kg more than 2008 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Rover Range Rover (319 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1989 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Rover Range Rover | 2008 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Rover | Tata |
| Model | Range Rover | Nano |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3947 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.1 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1986 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 37 L |
