1989 Rover Range Rover vs. 2009 Renault Logan
To start off, 2009 Renault Logan is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Rover Range Rover (185 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2009 Renault Logan. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 706 kg more than 2009 Renault Logan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Logan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Rover Range Rover (319 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Logan. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1989 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Logan.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Rover Range Rover | 2009 Renault Logan | |
Make | Rover | Renault |
Model | Range Rover | Logan |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3947 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.1 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1986 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |