1989 Saab 9000 vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Saab 9000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Saab 9000 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 150 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Saab 9000 weights approximately 475 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.

Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Saab 9000 (212 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Suzuki Equator. (171 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Saab 9000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Suzuki Equator. 2012 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1989 Saab 9000 has manual transmission. 1989 Saab 9000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Saab 9000 2012 Suzuki Equator
Make Saab Suzuki
Model 9000 Equator
Year Released 1989 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2290 cc 2501 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 150 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 212 Nm 171 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1450 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 3200 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]