1989 Skoda L vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1989 Skoda L is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Skoda L (58 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Skoda L should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Skoda L weights approximately 115 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Skoda L. (90 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1983 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Skoda L | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Skoda | Zastava |
| Model | L | 102 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2160 mm |
