1989 Toyota Camry vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1989 Toyota Camry is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1989 Toyota Camry. (89 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1989 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Camry weights approximately 10 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Toyota Camry. (141 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Toyota Camry | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Toyota | Triumph |
Model | Camry | 2000 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |