1989 Toyota Carina vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Carina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Carina would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1989 Toyota Carina. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1989 Toyota Carina.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Toyota Carina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Toyota Carina. (139 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Toyota Carina.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Toyota Carina | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Carina | Matrix |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 45 L |