1989 Toyota Celica vs. 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 1068 more horse power than 1989 Toyota Celica. (201 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 1989 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Celica weights approximately 270 kg more than 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero.
Because 1989 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Toyota Celica | 2009 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
| Make | Toyota | SSC |
| Model | Celica | Ultimate Aero |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 6350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 1269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6075 RPM |
| Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 437 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.9 seconds | 2.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1090 mm |
