1989 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2002 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2002 Skoda Fabia is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 26 kg more than 2002 Skoda Fabia.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Skoda Fabia has automatic transmission and 1989 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Skoda Fabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | 2002 Skoda Fabia | |
| Make | Toyota | Skoda |
| Model | Lite Ace | Fabia |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1390 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1074 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1460 mm |
